Ps4 Att Pace 5268ac Slow Upload Speed
| Spess_mehren | 2017-May-23 10:52 pm 5268AC in DMZ+ ThroughputI switched from Spectrum to Gigapower recently and have been battling to get normal speeds. I accept my 5268AC in DMZ+ mode, pointing to my EdgeRouter Lite. When traffic is going through my equipment, I am seeing somewhere around 90/120mbps(upload is usually higher for some reason). I tried using my ASA5506x too, with similar results. When I plug into the 5268AC directly, I get 900/900mbps or more than. Anyone experiencing bug like this in DMZ+ mode? Any suggestions are appreciated. |
| · actions · 2017-May-23 10:52 pm · | |
| Stride 5268AC TRENDnet TEW-829DRU | 2017-May-23 11:09 pm My just suggestion at this time would be to see if somewhere in the EdgeRouter Lite, you can notice out if its Ethernet interfaces are actually in gigabit mode. You can wait in the 5268AC's LAN/Wired Interfaces section to see what the 5268AC sees. Even these days you can withal meet Ethernet devices that tin can't seem to auto-negotiate a connection due to some incompatibility between the devices. I have occasionally had to put an inexpensive 5-port switch between such devices to brand them properly talk to each other. If y'all have any spare Ethernet patch cables, you might besides try replacing the ones attached to the EdgeRouter Light -- I have seen Ethernet cables restrict bandwidth, even if they are rated for gigabit service, and laissez passer all tests on a cable tester. |
| · actions · 2017-May-23 11:09 pm · | |
| | 2017-May-23 11:36 pm Aye something is going on with DMZ+ / IpPassthrough modes. At that place accept been quite a few posts lately with this issue with multiple 3rd party devices as routers, admission points, etc... Seems like a lot of this started happening around the same time the new profiles and speed tiers started rolling out. I am too seeing the same type of issues. In that location is supposed to be a RG firmware update around the corner, I'm hoping that corrects the effect, otherwise I will have to consider other options. I previously had 45M hsia on a bonded 55M contour and consistently saw 50M / 6Upload on my Asus 68U running in IpPassthrough way from my NVG599. Since going to 75M on the new 'var' profile, I am but all over the identify. anywhere fom twenty-50M _sometimes_ 60 downward but very inconsistent, but I practise see eighteen-20M Up consistently. Connecting directly to the RG I see 81/21... all the time... In that location are multiple reports of this, I am unsure what is going on. I can transfer locally at well over my subscribed speeds and using information technology on another competing connection as well nets much higher results. It just seems like for whatever reason, the RG is restricting download speeds in DMZ or IpPassthrough on these new profiles but it is very sparatic and inconsistent. Upload side seems to always be fine. DSL Condition Line 1 Line ii fifteen Min Cur Twenty-four hours Showtime Last Showtime Total Bonded Downstream Rate 90036 |
| · deportment · 2017-May-23 11:36 pm · | |
| | 2017-May-24 12:07 am I switched from Spectrum to Gigapower recently and have been battling to get normal speeds. I accept my 5268AC in DMZ+ mode, pointing to my EdgeRouter Lite. When traffic is going through my equipment, I am seeing somewhere effectually 90/120mbps(upload is usually higher for some reason). I tried using my ASA5506x too, with similar results. When I plug into the 5268AC directly, I get 900/900mbps or more than. Anyone experiencing issues like this in DMZ+ mode? Any suggestions are appreciated. I have seen no such slowdowns.... I have used DMZ+ with a PFSense firewall using an Intel NIC, and become 900/900+, and I switched to a cascaded router setup when I got static IP's, and still get 900/900. My wireless speeds are between 100 and 400, depending on where I am in the firm, using Ubiquiti Unifi Air conditioning Pro admission points (x ii, ane on either end of the house) What I would recommend is that you lot continue your internal IP space on a different /24 than the Pace gateway. Case: The Stride gateway is in the 192.168.1.x network, and so I configured my firewall, dhcp server, and any fixed IP devices in the 192.168.ii.x network. If you take problems reaching 192.168.one.254 in your electric current setup, or information technology is excruciatingly slow to do so, information technology is because of some quirk in DMZ+ that has trouble routing 192.168.1.x to another 192.168.1.x network. Separate the two, and you should be golden. Information technology should also be possible to alter the network of the Pace to something else, but I chose to keep the Footstep at default settings just in case AT&T ever requires me to reset it to defaults, or some firmware update resets the network settings back to 192.168.one.254..... |
| · actions · 2017-May-24 12:07 am · | |
| Skero | 2017-May-24 12:44 am Hey! I had the same issues too, what finally worked for me was setting my router to AP mode, not sure if you have that on your router though. Not certain if it's the correct fashion of going most it, but I had the same exact problem and was banging my caput trying to figure out why I was getting 100~mbps with upload being higher. |
| · actions · 2017-May-24 12:44 am · | |
| | 2017-May-24 6:39 am My personal router is on 192.168.two.1 and gets the public IP via IpPassthrough. RG is is 192.168.ane.254. I could set my router in AP style, however that eliminates the point and purpose of many things I use my own router for likewise the Commonly improved wifi. Martena i wonder if you lot are not seeing slowdowns because of your static ip and cascaded router configuration? Might take on the 59to test, I have merely been seeing this issue on IpPassthrough / DMZ+ configurations (599 / 5269) may have been a 589 in there also. Regardless it is quite repeatable, frustrating and annoying. |
| · actions · 2017-May-24 half-dozen:39 am · | |
| ss911der | 2017-May-24 9:01 am I take my Asus RT-AC88U behind the 5268 in DMZ mode, handing out 192.168.2.x addresses and I've been fine aside from having to power cycle the 5268 once in a while. Speed tests are always over 900 Mbps both directions. |
| · actions · 2017-May-24 nine:01 am · | |
| Spess_mehren | 2017-May-24 9:21 am I switched from Spectrum to Gigapower recently and have been battling to get normal speeds. I accept my 5268AC in DMZ+ mode, pointing to my EdgeRouter Calorie-free. When traffic is going through my equipment, I am seeing somewhere around 90/120mbps(upload is unremarkably higher for some reason). I tried using my ASA5506x too, with similar results. When I plug into the 5268AC directly, I get 900/900mbps or more. Anyone experiencing issues like this in DMZ+ way? Any suggestions are appreciated. I accept seen no such slowdowns.... I have used DMZ+ with a PFSense firewall using an Intel NIC, and get 900/900+, and I switched to a cascaded router setup when I got static IP's, and all the same become 900/900. My wireless speeds are betwixt 100 and 400, depending on where I am in the firm, using Ubiquiti Unifi AC Pro access points (x 2, i on either end of the house) What I would recommend is that yous keep your internal IP infinite on a different /24 than the Pace gateway. Example: The Pace gateway is in the 192.168.1.x network, so I configured my firewall, dhcp server, and any fixed IP devices in the 192.168.2.ten network. If you have problems reaching 192.168.one.254 in your current setup, or it is excruciatingly slow to do so, it is considering of some quirk in DMZ+ that has trouble routing 192.168.1.x to another 192.168.1.x network. Separate the two, and you should be golden. It should also be possible to change the network of the Pace to something else, merely I chose to proceed the Step at default settings only in case AT&T ever requires me to reset it to defaults, or some firmware update resets the network settings back to 192.168.1.254..... My internal network is on 10.10.x.x/24 subnets, with the exception of my invitee wifi which is 192.168.ten.0/24. I have tried playing around with various other subnets besides, both on my ERL and 5506x. I am seeing consistent speeds in all configurations with DMZ+. Is it possible I just got a bad RG? |
| · actions · 2017-May-24 9:21 am · | |
| kwayzcat | 2017-May-24 ix:49 am Effort resetting the 5268AC and start from scratch. Simply connect i client, the firewall. Then disable Wifi, etc. Thats what I would endeavour. Could be a bad gateway. Are you lot connecting your firewall to one of the 1-4 ports? |
| · actions · 2017-May-24 nine:49 am · | |
| | 2017-May-24 12:33 pm Martena i wonder if you are not seeing slowdowns because of your static ip and cascaded router configuration? Might have on the 59to test, I have only been seeing this consequence on IpPassthrough / DMZ+ configurations (599 / 5269) may have been a 589 in at that place also. Regardless it is quite repeatable, frustrating and annoying. I had my connection without static IP addresses for three months, and used DMZ+ with it, and it worked perfectly fine besides, 900+ Mbps.... What you do have to realize is that with DMZ+, you pass all routing requests on to the router y'all have behind your gateway, and that router has to have a cpu that tin handle 1 Gbit/south routing. Many routers on the cheaper market segment may have 1 Gbit/s ports, and the NIC's may exist able to switch at 1 Gbit/due south, only routing is a unlike story. @Spess_mehren: The Edgerouter Lite has some reports on not existence able to handle faster connections, doing a Google search I found someone on the Ubiquiti forums that upgraded from 50/5 to 300/xx on cable, and wasn't getting more than 150/xx throughput through the Edgerouter Lite, so you may be wanting to expect there for a solution as well. Here are a few posts that might help: »community.ubnt.com/t5/Ed ··· /1783676 »community.ubnt.com/t5/Ed ··· /1653538 »customs.ubnt.com/t5/Ed ··· /1230924 Exercise yous accept QoS enabled on the Edgerouter perhaps? That said: When my current PFSense firewall needs replacement, I am looking towards the Edgerouter line for replacement, as I already take Ubiquiti AP'due south.... simply I would exist looking at a slightly more robust model. I'm not convinced the culprit is the Stride GW in this case, based on some of the data in those topics the Edgerouter Lite SHOULD exist able to handle Gigabit/south internet without issues, but it DEPENDS on the configuration..... and so I would not discount that as the culprit. |
| · actions · 2017-May-24 12:33 pm · | |
| Spess_mehren | 2017-May-24 5:38 pm Martena i wonder if you are not seeing slowdowns because of your static ip and cascaded router configuration? Might have on the 59to examination, I have only been seeing this event on IpPassthrough / DMZ+ configurations (599 / 5269) may have been a 589 in there also. Regardless it is quite repeatable, frustrating and abrasive. I had my connexion without static IP addresses for 3 months, and used DMZ+ with information technology, and it worked perfectly fine equally well, 900+ Mbps.... What you do have to realize is that with DMZ+, you laissez passer all routing requests on to the router you have behind your gateway, and that router has to have a cpu that can handle ane Gbit/s routing. Many routers on the cheaper marketplace segment may have one Gbit/s ports, and the NIC's may be able to switch at 1 Gbit/s, but routing is a dissimilar story. @Spess_mehren: The Edgerouter Lite has some reports on non being able to handle faster connections, doing a Google search I found someone on the Ubiquiti forums that upgraded from 50/5 to 300/20 on cable, and wasn't getting more than 150/20 throughput through the Edgerouter Low-cal, and then y'all may be wanting to look at that place for a solution too. Here are a few posts that might assistance: »community.ubnt.com/t5/Ed ··· /1783676 »community.ubnt.com/t5/Ed ··· /1653538 »community.ubnt.com/t5/Ed ··· /1230924 Practice you have QoS enabled on the Edgerouter perhaps? That said: When my electric current PFSense firewall needs replacement, I am looking towards the Edgerouter line for replacement, as I already have Ubiquiti AP'southward.... but I would be looking at a slightly more robust model. I'm non convinced the culprit is the Footstep GW in this case, based on some of the data in those topics the Edgerouter Lite SHOULD be able to handle Gigabit/south internet without issues, but information technology DEPENDS on the configuration..... so I would not discount that as the culprit. No QOS enabled on my ERL. I am almost certain the culprit is the Stride, considering I am seeing a consistent 90/120 mbps when I use either my ERL or my ASA5506x( ith no inspection enabled) as the device receiving the WAN IP from the Pace. I know the ASA can handle more xc/120mbps, and if it was a configuration upshot on my equipment, I would encounter more variation between the tests with the ASA vs the ERL. Information technology sounds like I should have ATT replace the 5268. |
| · actions · 2017-May-24 v:38 pm · | |
| douggmc | 2017-May-24 6:nineteen pm Obvious starting time: Are you using same network cable? Could be bad/substandard. Try a different 1 before looking at anything more than sophisticated. Equally others said already, many many of u.s. are running our Step in 5286 in DMZ+ exactly as you are and tin go full gigabit. |
| · deportment · 2017-May-24 6:nineteen pm · | |
| Spess_mehren | 2017-May-25 v:48 pm Obvious first: Are y'all using aforementioned network cable? Could be bad/substandard. Endeavor a different 1 before looking at anything more sophisticated. Equally others said already, many many of us are running our Footstep in 5286 in DMZ+ exactly as you are and can get total gigabit. I double checked all my cabling and tested with various patch cables I had, not seeing much of a departure. I will become ahead and get a replacement 5268ac, if that doesn't do the trick and so I will know the result is something on my end. |
| · deportment · 2017-May-25 v:48 pm · | |
| dave006 | 2017-May-25 9:06 pm Yous are wasting your time getting a replacement 5268ac. Since your operation is fine when directly connected to the 5268ac. The problem is your ERL. What features are y'all using or have enabled? Some features are not implemented in hardware (hardware offload) on the ERL. Turn off everything but the absolute minimum. I also expect your ERL CPU to be maxed out. Dave |
| · actions · 2017-May-25 9:06 pm · | |
| | 2017-May-26 4:52 pm No QOS enabled on my ERL. I am nigh certain the culprit is the Pace, because I am seeing a consistent 90/120 mbps when I use either my ERL or my ASA5506x( ith no inspection enabled) as the device receiving the WAN IP from the Step. I know the ASA tin handle more than ninety/120mbps, and if information technology was a configuration issue on my equipment, I would see more variation between the tests with the ASA vs the ERL. It sounds like I should have ATT replace the 5268. I am still thinking it is your ERL. Showtime, lets accept a wait at the specs of your ASA5506-X: »www.cisco.com/c/en/u.s.a./su ··· del.html If you go to the detailed specs (click on more specifications), y'all volition see that if IPS is enabled or any other firewall and/or inspection services, the throughput doesn't come anywhere Near 1 Gbps, and can be as low as 125 Mbps max depending on what services are or are not turned on. So it isn't at all surprising you lot are seeing a very low throughput using that device on a ane Gbit/s connection. 2d, the fact that the Pace itself performs at 900/900+, is indicating that everything AT&T provided all the way to the ethernet handoff to *your* equipment is working perfectly. They aren't going to ship a tech with another Stride in his hands when it works the way it should. I would test your network with a device that you lot KNOW is capable of routing/processing i Gbps, then the Cisco ASA is out, and I am not sure the ERL is any better. Mind y'all, EdgeRouter makes Actually GOOD products, and I will probably buy one when I replace my PFSense router ane twenty-four hour period, but.... it will be a model upwardly from the Lite version, which just doesn't seem to exist capable of full Gigabit routing. A proficient mode of testing is to hard-wire a computer with an Intel NIC (preferably not a Realtek one, but if you just have Realtek, so be it...) to a LAN port, and configure DMZ+ to road all traffic to your PC. Earlier you do and so, enable the firewall in your computer to ensure no one breaks in. And then do some speedtests, and see how yous fare. If that works fine, y'all know its the routing hardware. If it does Non, I will start to believe something is up with the pace... :P - But the fact that the Pace works perfectly fine as a stand alone, has exist convinced it is not. Note: For the tape: Before I built my PFSense firewall (on a Core i-5 miniPC then good processing ability) I ran a Linksys EA7500 for a day or ii on Gigapower, and it had problem breaking 500 Mbps. It was however a pretty skillful router, but not worthy of 1 Gbps. A day subsequently I got Gigapower I congenital the PFSense firewall, and boom-chakalaka, 940/940 in both directions. So I sold the EA7500 for 50 bucks and called it a day. |
| · actions · 2017-May-26 4:52 pm · | |
Source: https://www.dslreports.com/forum/r31428579-5268AC-in-DMZ-Throughput
Posting Komentar untuk "Ps4 Att Pace 5268ac Slow Upload Speed"